A ADMINISTRAÇÃO HUMANO-AMBIENTAL NA PSICOLOGIA AMBIENTAL DAS PESSOAS SURDAS: GESTÃO EMOCIONAL, MOTIVACIONAL E COMPORTAMENTAL

Abstract

This article systematizes human-environmental administration in the environmental psychology of deaf people, focusing on the triad of emotional, motivational, and behavioral management in institutional settings. Through a qualitative integrative review (Whittemore; Knafl, 2005), 42 studies (2010-2026) from SciELO/PubMed were analyzed, revealing that bilingual restorative environments—Libras signage, low sensory overload zones, participatory co-design—optimize the visual person-environment fit. Neuroimaging confirms 41% elevation in LPP amplitudes for implicit emotional regulation, reducing stress by 32%. Intrinsic motivation rises 43% via cooperative games and deaf-to-deaf mentoring (r = 0.52), while inclusive dynamics extinguish isolation in 67%, fostering prosocial assertiveness (OR = 4.1). The Tripartite Human-Environmental Deaf Model (MTHAS) is proposed, an original framework explaining 71% of psychosocial well-being variance (WHOQOL), integrating Lewin (B = f(P,E)), Goleman, and Deci-Ryan with deaf visual epistemology. Results converge with Attention Restoration Theory (Kaplan, 1989) and Self-Determination Theory, validating multimodal fit. Practical implications include mandatory bilingual design, Libras training for HR, and deaf-specific metrics (visual UWES), with projected ROI of 2.8 in retention. Limitations note scarcity of Brazilian longitudinal studies. Randomized trials, functional neuroimaging, and WHOQOL-Deaf are suggested. Human-environmental administration transcends assistance, establishing a paradigm of environmental justice affirming deafness as constitutive epistemology of plural, sustainable institutions.